← Back to AI Lab

◱AI Lab3 min read

Making design-system governance an operating system, not a vibe check.

Craftline audits the Figma libraries in scope, detects broken or drifted components, and routes new and changed components through accountable review — combining automated scanning with designer coaching, not blame.

Stage
Prototype — demonstrable, not running at organisation scale
Type
Governance Platform
Integrates with
Figma
Scope
Selected Figma libraries

overview

Overview

Large organisations don't lose design-system consistency because designers don't care — they lose it because dozens of product teams, multiple Figma libraries, local exceptions, and regulated accessibility requirements make drift inevitable without a system to catch it. Craftline is that system: it scans the libraries connected to it, flags what's actually broken, and routes decisions to the right owner — without turning governance into surveillance.

workflows

Core workflows

01

Figma file audit

A plugin or scheduled scan reads component instances, variables, styles, naming, and local overrides, then a rule engine evaluates violations by severity — Critical, High, Medium, Low.

02

Broken component detection

Flags detached instances, unapproved or deprecated library sources, local style overrides replacing published variables, unauthorized variant changes, and missing accessibility annotations.

03

Component lifecycle

New and changed components move through four gated stages — Intake → Design Authority → Engineering Readiness → Release Governance — each requiring specific evidence before it can advance.

04

Exception management

Exceptions are allowed, but never silent: every one requires an owner, business reason, evidence, expiry date, migration plan, and approver.

coaching

Coaching, not blame

Designer scorecards combine adoption percentage, repeat critical/high violations, average remediation time, and approved-exception ratio into a single, explainable score — built for coaching conversations, not for ranking people against each other.

Designers must see remediation guidance, not just penalties.

principles

Production non-negotiables

VersionedGovernance rules are always versioned
EvidencedEvery violation carries evidence
ExpiringEvery exception has an expiry date
ExplainableEvery scorecard is explainable, not a black box

Critical violations block release handoff only when policy says so — the design-system team can always override, annotate, and audit every decision the system makes.

Limits and honest caveats

  • Stage is a prototype plus a stakeholder presentation — the workflow is designed and demonstrable, not running against production files across an organisation.
  • Scope is the libraries connected to it, not every Figma file in a company.
  • Designer scorecards carry a real risk of feeling like surveillance. They are scoped to coaching conversations, are explainable, and are never used for ranking or performance rating.
  • Permissions, data retention, an appeal route and a named governance owner are part of the model before any pilot runs.